Difference between revisions of "Don Rhodes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
As some of you 'Rhodites' in the organization know, things get a little wacky from this point. Document-wise and explanation-wise. Bear with us, there are new insights, but we also have new faces that we feel the need to keep informed. | As some of you 'Rhodites' in the organization know, things get a little wacky from this point. Document-wise and explanation-wise. Bear with us, there are new insights, but we also have new faces that we feel the need to keep informed. | ||
− | + | To do that, there are (unfortunately) ''two'' elephants in the room that we need to clear up. | |
− | + | <div class="spoiler mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"> | |
+ | '''Elephant the First: Reality Ripples''' | ||
+ | <div class="mw-collapsible-content"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | This would be the global passing of a recent ''"temporal-spatial issue"'' that cabals worldwide have come to refer to as "reality ripples." Lost alternate realities, the Mandela Effect, whatever you want to label it, it is the latest entry in the Council of Venice's Book of Secrets. | ||
Whatever you call the 13,521st entry, it's completely out of our field of knowledge. If only we had better staffing, more agents, more money, more everything - we don't, so we let the Council of Venice and the major cabals deal with the fall-out or lack-there-of. After all, the only thing the secret world knows is that something happened and people who know better have said so. All <u>we</u> ask is that you keep the concept in the back of your head as you read on. | Whatever you call the 13,521st entry, it's completely out of our field of knowledge. If only we had better staffing, more agents, more money, more everything - we don't, so we let the Council of Venice and the major cabals deal with the fall-out or lack-there-of. After all, the only thing the secret world knows is that something happened and people who know better have said so. All <u>we</u> ask is that you keep the concept in the back of your head as you read on. | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
− | Elephant | + | <div class="spoiler mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"> |
+ | '''Elephant the Second: Bigger, Badder, Not Reality Ripples''' | ||
+ | <div class="mw-collapsible-content"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | As far as the Big Three ''knew'', Don Rhodes operated as a Phoenician agent between late-2012 to mid-2014, which was plenty of time for major players to rack-up surveillance, get their files in order, write up a good dossier. Not to mention, retaining all official governmental paperwork from both topside and within the secret world. | ||
Except two of those factions came to <u>us</u> to investigate why their resources on this guy were all 'wrong'. Wrong in a sense of anomalous, not factually deficient. Though, the Illuminati being factually deficient is itself an anomaly, the observations they had were all incorrectly dated and entirely mismatched against their newer information on Don Rhodes. Ditto with the Templars. | Except two of those factions came to <u>us</u> to investigate why their resources on this guy were all 'wrong'. Wrong in a sense of anomalous, not factually deficient. Though, the Illuminati being factually deficient is itself an anomaly, the observations they had were all incorrectly dated and entirely mismatched against their newer information on Don Rhodes. Ditto with the Templars. | ||
Line 83: | Line 93: | ||
But there was absolutely no evidence of tampering or even ''scrutiny'' over the most obvious of discrepancies until we came along. Everything we do as people has a trace, a link, a suspicion behind it - this is what our ''jobs are predicated on'' here at the Black Watchmen, but not only did we find nothing, nobody in the relevant channels seemed to question obvious and crucial mistakes - that worries us. '''A lot.''' | But there was absolutely no evidence of tampering or even ''scrutiny'' over the most obvious of discrepancies until we came along. Everything we do as people has a trace, a link, a suspicion behind it - this is what our ''jobs are predicated on'' here at the Black Watchmen, but not only did we find nothing, nobody in the relevant channels seemed to question obvious and crucial mistakes - that worries us. '''A lot.''' | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
'''As of this briefing, however, we have gained a view of the bigger picture.''' | '''As of this briefing, however, we have gained a view of the bigger picture.''' | ||
=== The Yellow Anchor Incident === | === The Yellow Anchor Incident === | ||
− | |||
= Field Profile = | = Field Profile = |